Like "diversity," and "multi-culturalism," "sustainability" is assumed a priori to be a net good without any hard evidence to support the assertion. Additionally, it is such a broad term that adapting it to any particular human endeavor is an entirely subjective evaluation by the experts who know better than we do how to live our lives.
Like "climate change" it is an excuse for elaborate regulatory schemes that effectively put all economic activity under the thumbs of government bureaucrats.
Now the EPA is defining "sustainability" as a core mission and contemplating how it can increase its own regulatory power without the need for legislative action. In plain language, they are planning how they can twist the law and redefine the terms to allow them to usurp powers that were never contemplated by the legislators who drafted the laws is question, and which surely exceed all rational constitutional scope.
The EPA is a rogue organization, one of the biggest enemies of U.S. productivity and it desperately needs to be strongly reined in, if not disbanded.
More on rogueoperator's blog:
No comments:
Post a Comment